On Sun, 2017-11-12 at 13:46 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 11/11/2017 07:00 PM, William Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 22:16 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > Atomic workstation is included in the normal fedora release > > > process > > > and is part of RC 1.7: > > > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-27-20171101. > > > 0/co > > > mpose/WorkstationOstree/x86_64/iso/Fedora-WorkstationOstree- > > > ostree- > > > x86_64-27-1.2.iso > > > > > > > > > > Hey mate, > > > > I've found three issues so far: > > > > 1) opensc should be part of the base image as it enables freeipa > > smartcard authentication and other related parts to work correctly > > (I'm > > layering it in for now ) > > you can open an issue/PR here: https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree- > config/blob/master/f/fedora-ostree-workstation.json Done! Thank you for the tip, > > > > > > 2) You can not rpm-ostree install vim: > > > > Applying 68 overlays... error: Checking out vim-common-2:8.0.1187- > > 1.fc27.x86_64: Hardlinking > > c0/679f8a0eefe6ddb91b60afe7ff885aa8ee2b39fea8a0dbf342d7758733a7d8.f > > ile > > to ex.1.gz: File exists > > > > I believe this is due to a duplicate file in vim-common and vim > > packages, but I'd like your insight to this > > Yes you are right. I think this will actually be fixed in the first > set > of updates provided after we do a release. Since you started with > such an > early RC you'll need to update /etc/ostree/remotes.d/*.conf to have: > > url=https://dl.fedoraproject.org/ostree/27/ Right, I'll update this tonight. > > > > > 3) I own a macbook pro, which means it has a broadcom wireless. > > This > > requires firmware that is non-free to be installed. Sadly, the > > install > > procedure is "extract some files to /lib/firmware" > > > > Of course, this doesn't work on atomic because the base system is > > readonly. So what would be a good course of action here for > > firmware > > inclusion like this? I can make an rpm for this at home I think, > > but > > would be great to have this use case sorted a bit. > > Does an rpm not exist for it anywhere? Does putting it in > /usr/local/lib/firmware/ > work? I'm not sure. I think all of /usr is RO, so I would suspect not. I'll check tonight to be sure. /usr/lib/firmware certainly did not work. > > > > > > > Hope that helps! Otherwise, it's going really well, install was > > painless, and I already have most of my applications working with > > flatpak :) > > > > Thanks for all the hardwork! > > > > -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part