[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box
> I don't object exactly, but at some point we're really going to have to invest in
> de-duplicating Vagrant work.
> See:
> https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2015-April/msg00027.html
> and
> https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2015-April/msg00047.html
> This most closely overlaps
> https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/
> The kickstart file has a lot of overlap with (but is not exactly the same as) the
> Vagrant boxes for Fedora 22 (both Base and Atomic), which are configured here:
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/
> Your kickstart configuration could probably be fairly easily written as a Vagrant
> provisioner on top of either the Cloud Base or Atomic - or on top of OMV.

I too agree with Colin. If someone wants to make a custom spin of a
box, my vagrant-builder tool does exactly that.
You can use any of the existing Fedora produced base images as a base.

I've been down the roads to/from vagrant for many years now. It would
be my recommendation to build on existing work I've done, or to have
good reasons why not to. I'd rather throw out my work than to
constantly see people re-invent where it's not needed.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]