[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes in containers
- From: Tim St Clair <tstclair redhat com>
- To: Adam Miller <maxamillion fedoraproject org>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes in containers
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:07:10 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Miller" <maxamillion fedoraproject org>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:05:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes in containers
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
> > Hey, I noticed this PR:
> >
> > https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/pull/112
> >
> > What do you guys think about switching to Kubernetes-in-a-container
> > by default? We should likely keep the Kubernetes in the Atomic Host
> > available for some time, but how long?
>
IMHO for the whole ship to right itself, it will probably take 2+ release cycles.
> I think ripping out something from the core of Atomic should be done
> at the turn of some kind of release milestone for each respective
> distro project just because the users generally expect large changes
> at that time.
> >
+1
> > I know this would affect some of the Ansible and documentation work
> > out there.
> >
> > Another thing directly impacted is release engineering; this needs
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service
> > to be built from the distribution.
>
> Just to clarify, you're saying that the Layered Image Build Service
> needs to be in place so that the kubernetes container can originate
> from the distro producing project (i.e. - Fedora)?
>
> Or were you suggesting something else?
>
> >
> > Because Kubernetes is still highly privileged, it seems likely to me
> > that we'd still want releases coordinated with the Atomic Host releases.
>
Yes, but the whole goal of putting it in a container should be to avoid reduce that necessity.
> +1 - From the Fedora side, I think this is something we'd want to
> coordinate with the 2-week cycle being worked on right now.
>
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
>
> +1 - I think the Atomic system should be only as large as it needs to
> be and anything that can realistically run in a container, should.
>
> -AdamM
>
>
--
Cheers,
Timothy St. Clair
Red Hat Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]