[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested
- From: Adam Miller <maxamillion fedoraproject org>
- To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud lists fedoraproject org>
- Cc: "atomic-devel projectatomic io" <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:35:24 -0500
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2016 12:21 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello all,
>
> Hey Adam,
>
>> The original schedule for today's Fedora Two-Week Atomic Release
>> was going to include a cut-over of our back end Release Infrastructure
>> and AutoCloud automated QA environment to be compose based (one of the
>> building blocks we need in place to make the future of the release
>> process more flexible). However, because of the most recent Fedora 24
>> release slip this has caused a conflict of schedules (a schedule that
>> was agreed upon at the Cloud FAD a few weeks ago) and as a side effect
>> of the Fedora 24 GA event we are currently in a Fedora Infrastructure
>> Freeze. During this Freeze, we can not make the back end changes
>> needed to cut over to the new versions of the RelEng Composer and
>> AutoCloud which are currently hosting the Fedora 24 Atomic Images.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
>>
>> This is something that slipped through the cracks and ultimately lands
>> on me, and for that I would like to apologize to members of Project
>> Atomic, Fedora Cloud WG, and both project communities at large.
>>
>> That being said, we have a couple of options on how to handle this and
>> I would like to request feedback from others.
>>
>> We can slip the Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release by 1 week just
>> as the Fedora 24 GA Release was slipped and target next Tuesday
>> (2016-06-21). This would "reset the clock" on the Two Week Releases
>> and we will then have a Two-Week Release every two weeks following
>> that one.
>
> I would vote for this one.
+1
>
> If we go this path could we link here to a candidate 2WA image that we would
> release next Tuesday? We could then focus some manual testing on this image and
> make sure we are A OK for next weeks release.
Images are here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/
We shouldn't need any manual testing, these images are already being
tested by the new Autocloud just as the current ones are but the new
system isn't in Production yet and therefore isn't feeding fedmsg data
into Datagrepper which is what the 2WA release script queries and uses
the resulting metadata to populate fields for the rest of the release
process including the information it then passes over fedmsg to update
the websites.
-AdamM
>
>>
>> Or
>>
>> We can skip this Two-Week Atomic Release all together and target the
>> next Two-Week Atomic Release scheduled date of Tuesday 2016-07-05.
>>
>> Or
>>
>> We can release a Fedora 23 Based Two-Week Atomic image today (or
>> tomorrow, pending how fast feedback rolls in) and target the next
>> Two-Week Release window as the time to cut over to Fedora 24.
>>
>> I'm open to alternate suggestions but do note that aspects of the Two
>> Week release process are limiting at present, which is something this
>> new Infrastructure deployment will be the starting point to resolve,
>> so there may be restrictions on how creative of a solution we can come
>> up with in the near term.
>>
>> Once again, I would like to apologize to all who have been impacted by
>> this and we hope that with the planned changes to the Infrastructure
>> and the Release code will allow for more flexibility in the future.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> -AdamM
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud lists fedoraproject org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud lists fedoraproject org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]