[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] Using docker run -ti for interactive INSTALL?



On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:54:45AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/03/2016 11:30 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:22:52AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >>On 03/03/2016 11:14 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >>>It's a pity LABELs don't seem to accept / preserve array values --
> >>>
> >>>	[ 'docker', 'run', 'arg with space' ]
> >>>
> >>>could be used to distinguish situation when shell should not be used.
> >>Patches accepted.  :^)
> >But these would be for docker, right?
>
> No atomic.

When I use Dockerfile with

	LABEL INSTALL [ 'docker', 'run', '--rm', '${NAME}', '/bin/test.sh', 'install', 'test install with space, as well as comma' ]
	LABEL RUN 'docker run --rm ${NAME} /bin/test.sh run test run'
	CMD [ "/bin/test.sh", "cmd", "cmd with space" ]

the docker inspect on the image says

    "ContainerConfig": {
        ...
        "Cmd": [
            "/bin/sh",
            "-c",
            "#(nop) CMD [\"/bin/test.sh\" \"cmd\" \"cmd with space\"]"
        ],
        ...
        "Labels": {
            "INSTALL": "[ docker, run, --rm, ${NAME}, /bin/test.sh, install, test install with space, as well as comma ]",
            "RUN": "docker run --rm ${NAME} /bin/test.sh run test run"
        }
    },
    ...
    "Config": {
        ...
        "Cmd": [
            "/bin/test.sh",
            "cmd",
            "cmd with space"
        ],
        ...
        "Labels": {
            "INSTALL": "[ docker, run, --rm, ${NAME}, /bin/test.sh, install, test install with space, as well as comma ]",
            "RUN": "docker run --rm ${NAME} /bin/test.sh run test run"
        }
    },

That seems to indicate it's docker itself that parses the array syntax
into string, not atomic.

While we might try to do some magic based on the string starting with
"[", it seems impossible to parse it back and recreate the information
that was lost when it was stringified.

Or am I missing something about getting at the original LABEL value?

-- 
Jan Pazdziora
Sr. Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Special Projects, Red Hat


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]