[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] Who can Slack?

This should not be the Kubernetes channel.  I can see why Sarah N gave a dubious response.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com> wrote:
On 03/25/2016 06:06 AM, Brandon Jozsa wrote:
> So would an Atomic SIG group in Kubernetes be the best, or is an Atomic
> group with a Kubernetes, Docker, Cockpit, Nelecule, RPM-OSTree SIG
> groups make the most sense? Just tossing some of my
> [sort-of-unimportant] thoughts out there. I kind of lean towards the
> latter, but in the end...*/anything/* is better than freaking email...

Whereas I'm a big fan of email.

Regarding the SIG group, the first hurdle is that Kubernetes may not
consider it appropriate for that.  I've chatted briefly with Sarah N. on
this, and she's dubious.  If Kubernetes says no, then the decision is easy.

Ideally, we'd have a public RedHat Slack, so at least there would be
only one place to log in for all RH public projects.  Let me bring that
idea up with OSAS.

Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]