On 04/22/2015 05:36 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 04/22/2015 05:22 PM, smajor gmail com wrote: >> I agree as stated in my first post being able to develop on atomic >> is something I have wanted myself. Screen itself okay, but how many >> more packages are needed to truly develop on atomic like the post I >> responded to indicated, so in turn I gave up what would have been a +1 >> from me. >> >> “Yes and no. Sure Atomic's main use will be as cloud host, but why not >> develop your containers on the host you'll ultimately be using? Plus >> Atomic is a very good *as an OS* full stop. I actually prefer >> virtualizing and working with Atomic to the other minimal OS's or even >> real Fedora. I don't think I'll be alone in this, especially when you >> consider the "I use OSX and virtualize Linux" crowd. Once you embrace >> the "everything in a container" model of Atomic, it's a really good >> experience in and of itself. > > This quote should be a short blog at ProjectAtomic. I love it. Might be something we can add here: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/ Or maybe we need a page similar to that on Project Atomic. Alternatively/additionally - might be nice to have an expanded post that discusses how you're using Atomic as a minimal host on OS X. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature