[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Quorum-based voting for system upgrade
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Quorum-based voting for system upgrade
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:18 -0400
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 04:53 AM, Natale Vinto wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for feedbacks. So, as far I understand, the logic (a module?)
> between daemonized rpm-ostree and any kubernetes node evacuation
> feature that move pods elsewhere, is responsible of upgrade and reboot
> machines, like having a lock grant by kubernetes successful evacuation
> operation.
Not sure I see why a lock would be needed; the PRs that sghosh linked for "draining"
should work well.
> What about some underline IaaS platform exists, as for Openstack,
> would be Kubernetes to invoke for instance Compute API?
What would be the value of that over just invoking `systemctl reboot`?
That said, for guests in an IaaS environment, the OSTree (or in general
in-machine updates) can be replaced with building updated VM
images. If one does that, then one would need to integrate with the
IaaS infrastructure for updates.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]