[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Add Nvidia GPU to Centos Atomic Node
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: Stephen Milner <smilner redhat com>
- Cc: atomic-devel <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Add Nvidia GPU to Centos Atomic Node
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:08:20 -0500
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 02:29 PM, Stephen Milner wrote:
> What about literally providing dkms in a container? It wouldn't
> directly take care of the original request but it would give an avenue
> for folks to use the dkms toolchain if they'd like to in AH without
> package layering.
Maybe? Are we trying to replace dkms for yum-managed systems too?
I'm a bit worried about the sustainability of adding a whole other model
to dkms without trying to delete one at the same time. That said,
it might not be *too* hard to get a PoC here.
Offhand I feel like focusing on cri-o/kube in-syscontainers is more important?
Just today I saw from IRC chat:
https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/commit/9bef0bee1c4881469fbd1688b6e6c73a30ebb8d9
Yet there's no
https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/kubespray
for any *AH =( (Or for that matter Fedora...I just glanced at it
and it looks like it's python2, which brings us to
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-August/msg00001.html
)
Though someone who's doing e.g. OpenShift-on-AH and
wants to do GPGPU/ML using Nvidia GPUs in their cluster
might have a different perspective!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]