2017-September Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
- [atomic-devel] Atomic Community Meeting October 2: call for agenda items,
Josh Berkus
- [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic/Cloud Test Day Tomorrow 9/29,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Who got accepted to Kubecon?,
Josh Berkus
- [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-09-27,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2017-09-18,
Jason Brooks
- [atomic-devel] New CentOS Atomic Host with OverlayFS Storage,
Jason Brooks
- [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-09-20,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Announcing CRI-O 1.0.0-rc2,
Mrunal Patel
- [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora,
Tomas Tomecek
- [atomic-devel] Any idea what happened to the Fedora 27 ostree refs yesterday?,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Containerization and Atomic,
Eliska Slobodova
- [atomic-devel] new atomic presentations repo,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Outreachy intern?,
Josh Berkus
- [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-09-13,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Atomic Community Meeting: call for Topics, Moderator,
Josh Berkus
- Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement,
Dusty Mabe
- [atomic-devel] Announcing cri-o 1.0.0-rc1,
Mrunal Patel
- Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic and NIST-800/STIG compliance,
Ryan Barry
- [atomic-devel] Can anyone do DevOpsDays Boston?,
Josh Berkus
- [atomic-devel] Hi - I'm a developer from the oVirt project, and as we look towards tighter integration with OpenShift plus a potential pivot to Kubevirt, we're taking a very close look at Atomic. However, there are some features from oVirt Node which are not present in Atomic Host which we'd really like to see. Specifically, a NIST-800 partitioning scheme, which basically amounts to separate partitions/LVs for the following: /home /opt /var /var/log /var/log/audit (ideally with any 'persistent' data like the rpmdb relocated off of /var, with the contents of /var[/*] being the same across all ostree instances, so logs are not lost if users need to roll back). In my testing, Atomic seems to only take ~3GB of the volume group when installed, though I understand that the remainder of the volume group is often used for Docker image storage. We performed a conversion to a NIST-800 layout as part of an update on oVirt Node, but we were fortunate enough to be using lvmthin, so we didn't need to worry too m,
Ryan Barry
- [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-09-06,
Jason Brooks
- [atomic-devel] Shirts for Atomic contribs,
Josh Berkus
- [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170905,
Dusty Mabe
- Re: [atomic-devel] rawhide compoe - error: unlinkat: No such file or directory,
Dusty Mabe
- Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic community meeting next week, or not?,
Josh Berkus